Any attempt to punish Mark
Waugh for alleged corruption could become a legal minefield, the
Australian Cricketers' Association warned Wednesday.
While Waugh protests his innocence on the
renewed claim he was involved with an Indian bookmaker, the ACA said
problems could confront the Australian Cricket Board (ACB).
Waugh's reputation has been sullied since
an Indian bookmaker claimed three weeks ago that he gave the Australian
batsman 20,000 US dollars for information on match, pitch and weather
conditions.
Waugh denied he received that amount,
insisting he took 4,000 US dollars for a deal in 1994, which was exposed
two years ago.
The International Cricket Council's
anti-corruption unit is investigating the claims to decide whether the
allegation refers to the exposed deal or a separate matter.
But if evidence contradicts Waugh's
denials, the ACB could face problems punishing its player.
Hypothetically, Waugh accepted money
before such a deal was deemed illegal by cricketing boards.
Only since last year have players been
forced to sign declarations that they will not be involved in any corrupt
conduct.
Players could take legal action if they
were to be punished by their boards for incidents prior to those
declarations, the ACA said.
"I'm sure players would seek
protection from legal circles (if such a problem arose)," ACA chief
executive Tim May said Wednesday.
"It is their job and their vocation
and if something wasn't a crime at that particular time then he should
able to ply his trade.
"It's an incredibly, incredibly
complicated issue."
The players' union said if a player took
legal action, a national cricket board could be forced into court to
defend a punishment which may have questionable legal grounds.
Any potential action against Waugh could
be different because he has already been secretly fined by the ACB and
forced to give evidence under oath at two inquiries.
Waugh was docked 10,000 dollars (5,200
US) by the ACB in 1995 and recently said he had nothing more to add to
evidence he gave at the inquiries.
May said the legal issue had been jointly
raised by the ACA and the ACB and he was so far satisfied with the
follow-up.
"There are some concerns in that
regard but I believe that the ACB and the ICC are working closely to
determine the legal position," May said.
ACB chief executive Malcolm Speed was
unavailable for comment late Wednesday. |